There is a particular kind of argument that happens in families. You will recognise it instantly. It usually begins with a sentence that sounds perfectly calm and reasonable. The sentence is this: “I’m not arguing…but”. Which is normally a reliable indicator that an argument has already begun.
The remarkable thing about family arguments is that everyone involved is absolutely convinced that they are the one person in the room who is being perfectly reasonable. Everyone else, obviously, has gone quite mad.
If you have ever sat through a PCC meeting, you will recognise the phenomenon immediately. One person is explaining the obvious solution, another person is explaining why that solution will destroy the parish forever, and a third person is quietly wondering whether this might be the moment to put the kettle on.
The Gospel this morning begins with an argument. Jesus has just cast a demon out of someone. Which you might think would be the sort of thing everyone could agree is good news. A person is healed. A life is restored. A burden is lifted.
But instead it triggers a theological dispute. Some people say, “This must be the work of God.” Others say, “No, clearly he’s in league with the devil.” And a few stand at the back asking for another miracle, just to be absolutely certain.
At which point Jesus says the rather famous line: “Every kingdom divided against itself becomes a desert, and house falls on house.” In another Gospel account of the same story, he says: “a house divided against itself cannot stand.”
It is one of those sentences that sounds very clear… until you start applying it to real life. Because if unity were easy, the Church would have managed it by now.
Christians sometimes talk as though division is a modern tragedy. But if you read the New Testament carefully, you discover that Christians have been disagreeing with each other since about half past Easter. Paul argues with Peter. Churches argue about circumcision. Entire congregations fall out over food, worship, and leadership. If there had been parish magazines in the first century, the letters page would have been unprintable.
By the time John writes his Gospel, he remembers Jesus praying, “that they may all be one.” Which is a beautiful prayer. But the fact that Jesus prayed it, and especially that John included it around 70 years later, suggests something important: unity was already fragile.
Human beings are extraordinarily good at disagreement.
Which brings us to Jeremiah. Jeremiah is speaking to people who are very sure they know what God wants. They have the Temple. They have the traditions. They have the religious system. Everything is tidy and well organised. And then Jeremiah, annoying, interfering, meddling Jeremiah, stands up and says something deeply inconvenient.
“Listen up,” says Jeremiah. “God says this: listen to my voice.”
Not my archive.
Not my carefully preserved system of dusty writings.
My voice.
And that is interesting, because a voice is something living. A voice moves. A voice interrupts you halfway through explaining why you are right. A voice sometimes calls you into places you had no intention of going.
Jeremiah says the people refused to listen. Instead, he says, they “went backward and not forward.” Which is a wonderfully human description of religious life.
Because the great temptation in religion is not wickedness. It is certainty: the comforting belief that we already know everything God is ever going to say — about everything, to every society, and in every new situation humanity encounters.
The Gospel story pushes that even further. Jesus tells a strange little parable about a strong man guarding his house. Everything is secure. Everything is locked down. The system works perfectly. Until someone stronger turns up and rearranges the furniture.
The Kingdom of God, it seems, has a habit of doing that: just when we think the house is tidy, God moves the chairs.
Now Christians today disagree about many things. Some of those disagreements are currently very visible in the Anglican world. At the moment, there are people in different parts of our Communion trying to decide what faithfulness looks like — and in some cases even building new structures in order to guard what they believe is the truth.
And it would be very easy — and very satisfying — to stand here and declare that our side has understood God perfectly while everyone else has tragically missed the point. But history makes that rather difficult.
Because Christians have been absolutely certain before. The Church was once absolutely certain about slavery. Absolutely certain about the role of women. Absolutely certain about many things which, over time, the Church slowly — and sometimes painfully — reconsidered. That does not mean truth changes with fashion. But it might mean that God’s voice is sometimes still speaking.
And sometimes — rather inconveniently — that voice sounds like someone we disagree with.
So perhaps the deeper question behind today’s Gospel is not simply “Who is right?” Perhaps the question is: where do we see the work of God bringing life?
Because Jesus says something very interesting in the middle of the argument. “If it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.”
In other words: look at the fruit. Look at the healing. Look at the freedom. Look at the life appearing where there used to be fear. And then ask yourself: could God be at work here?
Let me finish with a small parable.
Imagine a large, old house. The sort of house that has been lived in for centuries. Every generation has added something: a room here, a staircase there, a slightly puzzling cupboard that nobody quite remembers building.
Now imagine the family living in that house. They love it deeply. They know every corner of it. They have strong opinions about how the furniture should be arranged. And every so often, someone says, “I think the house needs to change a little.”
At which point half the family say, “Yes, because the house must keep growing.” And the other half say, “Absolutely not, because the house must be preserved.”
And the interesting thing is this. Both groups love the same house. Both believe they are protecting it. The real danger comes when they decide the other half are not family anymore. Because once that happens, the house stops being a home.
Jesus does not promise us a Church without disagreement. But he does keep reminding us that the Kingdom of God is bigger than our arguments.
And if God still has a voice, then none of us has the final paragraph yet. Which may be slightly unsettling. But it is also hopeful. Because the God who keeps speaking is also the God who keeps gathering people together — even people who occasionally argue like family.
And if the Kingdom of God can survive two thousand years of bishops and people arguing (and the occasional PCC meeting)…
…it may yet survive us Anglicans. Amen.






