Texts: 1 Cor 1.10-18 & Matt 4.12-23. Epiphany 3.
Arguments,
factions and fighting. Sadly, these have
been features of the life of the church, even from the earliest days. In this morning’s reading from the first
chapter of Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, we hear Paul addressing such
arguments, factions and fighting head on.
He certainly
wastes no time getting to the point. His
entire letter contains some of the most beautiful, poetic Scripture ever
written, especially his famous hymn to Love in chapter 13. But most of this beauty is a response to the
reality on the ground…the reality that the Christians in Corinth were at each
other’s throats.
What is it
that drives such factionalism? What is
about a people who know that they have seen a great light, and who have heard
Jesus’ call of ‘Follow me’, who nevertheless feel the need to argue with each
other, so passionately, about matters of faith?
It was
certainly the case for the early church.
The first great debate centred around circumcision, and whether or not
non-Jewish Christians should be subject to the same rules as Jewish ones. Intriguingly, St Paul and St Peter found
themselves on opposite sides of that debate, until Peter received his famous
dream.
Other
debates throughout the centuries have centred on the correct ways to celebrate
the Lord’s Supper, or on the correct time of life to administer baptism, or the
correct way to govern the church. More
recently, the church has been grappling with correct approaches to the question
of marriage and same-sex relationships.
In the Roman church, the question of the correctness of a celibate
priesthood has once more raised its head.
The key word
in all these debates, past and present, is the word ‘correct’. Human
beings seem to have an inbuilt desire to be told what to believe, or how to
behave. We want to know where the
dividing line is, between ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’. It is inherent in us.
Much of this
is rooted in our childhood. As St Paul
ruminates in the letter to the Corinthians, ‘when I was a child, I behaved like
a child, I thought like a child’. One of
the characteristics of childhood is that we have not yet learned right from
wrong. We need to be taught the
difference between ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’ behaviour. And so we adopt a mind-set which is dependent
on external authority – we become dependent on others to tell us how to behave;
on our parents, or our church, or our Government, or our teachers.
But the
world into which we are born is so confusing.
Just when we think we’ve got a handle on what kind of behaviour or
attitudes are ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect’, the world will throw us an example of
exactly the opposite view. So, for
example, we are taught that ‘stealing is wrong’…but it’s ok for a starving man
to steal an apple, or for an international company to steal the resources of a
poor country. For, certainly, no-one
does anything to stop them.
Or we are
taught that coveting is wrong…but its ok for us to desire all the wonderful
clothes, gadgets, kitchen cabinets and cars which are paraded before us on the
television.
Or we are
taught that murder is wrong…but its ok for airplanes and drones to drop bombs
from the sky, regardless of collateral damage to innocent women and children.
You see, all
morality is contextual. It’s easy to
create a moral rule in one’s own context.
But whether that rule turns out to be universal depends entirely on the
context of everyone else. Help me! What am I supposed to do?
Confronted
with this hard reality of life, many religious people turn to the Bible in the
hope that it can provide some certainty…some direct-from-God instructions about
what is correct and incorrect. But,
sadly, we find that the Bible itself is full of contradictory positions on a
whole range of moral topics. The 10
Commandments condemn murder, theft and covetousness, but this does not seem to
have been a problem for Joshua as he led the people of Israel on a murderous rampage
through the land of Canaan, stealing the very land from under the feet of the
Canaanites.
The 10
commandments teach that adultery is wrong, but when King David effectively murders
a man so that he can possess his gorgeous wife, he receives little more than a
divine slap on the wrist.
And so, the
child within us, who longs for simple rules and guidance, feels itself confused
and at sea. We reach out for religious
leaders who sound authoritative. We hold
onto those leaders who can quote reams of Scripture to support their own
hypothesis about what is ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect’. We end up following those leaders, like children
after the pied piper, because they seem to know the way - often because we
ourselves have not bothered to read the Bible for ourselves.
Martin Luther,
John Calvin, the Pope, the Prophet Mohammed, John Wesley, Joseph Smith of the
Mormons, George Fox of the Quakers, Charles Taze Russell of the Jehovah’s
witnesses, Billy Graham, or any number of world-wide evangelists and teachers
who claim that they have received a unique insight from God. They know what is correct or incorrect. And so we will follow them. Like children. Even though they lead us into direct
opposition with brothers and sisters from other parts of the church. Exactly as St Paul found was happening with
the followers of Apollos, Cephas and himself.
Into this
confusion, Jesus speaks to the child inside of all of us and says ‘Follow me’.
To follow
Jesus means to follow his Way. It means
living as he lived, and taking our cues about what is correct or incorrect
behaviour from him. Here is the leader
who would not condemn the woman caught in adultery, the one who promised
paradise to a thief on a cross. Here is
the leader who welcomed the stranger, and ate with the outcasts. Here is the leader who offered healing and
forgiveness to all. Here is the leader
who steadfastly refused to argue the finer points of theology, but who instead
spoke in ambiguous parable. Here is a
leader who poured himself out for the benefit of others, living simply with
only the basics of life.
St Paul said
that when he became a man, he put away childish things. For him, that included the assumption that he
could be an arbiter of correctness, with the right of stoning to death all
those who opposed him. Instead, he became
an evangelist of grace, truly grasping that rules, rights and wrongs were
childish and contentious matters. All
that mattered for him, as a grown up follower of Christ, was God’s grace –
which was sufficient for him. As he said
in this morning’s reading, he stopped using eloquent wisdom, and spoke only of
the Cross, the ultimate symbol of God’s grace.
Here, then,
is our example. Here is our path to
take. In this week of prayer for
Christian Unity, we who follow Jesus are not invited to proclaim and pronounce
on rights and wrongs. We are simply
called to proclaim the good news of a graceful God…who loves us, and saves us,
even when we are in the wrong.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment