Texts: Jeremiah 7.23–28 & Luke 11.14–23
As someone who has a keen
interest in politics, I am sorely tempted
to preach on this morning’s Old Testament reading from the prophet
Jeremiah. Despairingly, he cries out ‘This is the nation that did not obey the
voice of the Lord their God…; truth has perished; it is cut off from their
lips.’ In our era of fake truth and
political spin (on all sides), it would be deeply satisfying to rant for a few
minutes. I’d love to list all the ways
that truth has become a casualty of the battlefield of politics in recent
years. But, from previous sermons, I
think you probably already know what I think on this topic! I think you already understand how far I
think the Christian nations of the West have departed from the teachings of
Christ.
So instead, let’s delve a little
deeper into the nature of Truth itself.
In today’s Gospel, we find Jesus debating with those tiresome
Pharisees. They demand to know by what
power does he cast demons – accusing him of using the Devil’s authority. Jesus, in response, employs reason. (He is, after all, the ‘logos’ – the reason,
wisdom and Word of God). He asks the
Pharisees whether there is any logic at all in their question. Why would the Devil cast out demons? For, as he says in a memorable and wise
saying, ‘a Kingdom divided against itself cannot stand’.
I’m sure that phrase has gone
through the minds of the Royal family this week. Whatever our views about Harry and especially
Meghan’s public utterances, the Royal household – and by extension, the Royal
Kingdom - has once again been divided.
Will it stand? I suspect it
will. After all, the House of Windsor
has many years’ experience of managing such crises – as demonstrated this week
by the official Palace statement about Meghan and Harry’s complaints.
For me, the most interesting 3 words
of the 69 in the Palace statement were these: ‘recollections may vary’. These incisive words invite us to think about
our own memories of past hurts, or simply of past events, in our own life. And they invite us acknowledge that the
actual truth of any past event is very difficult indeed to establish. Our memories are not video cameras – our brains
record a mixture of emotion, smell, sight and sound…and we know, from much
scientific research, that those memories change over time, depending on what we
ponder about the event as we revisit it in our minds.
Dreams also serve to refashion
our memories. If they are especially
traumatic events, dreams can serve to soften the focus and the hurt, helping us
to live with the emotional damage of the memory. For some people, especially those with
post-traumatic distress disorder, dreams can sometimes do the opposite. They heighten or amplify the events – even adding
details which didn’t actually exist.
Truth, therefore, becomes hard to find in the repository of memory.
Pontius Pilate, another monarchical
figure, famously asked Jesus, ‘what is Truth?’. This implied that the truth of his situation
was very different from that of Jesus at the crucial moment of decision. Pilate’s ‘truth’ was that he had enormous
expectations placed upon his shoulders, from Rome, and from the Jewish leaders
and people. Pilate’s truth was that he
needed to put down a potential rebellion against Rome, and therefore needed to
permit the state murder of a man he considered innocent. Pilate’s truth was that the needs of the many
outweighed the needs of the one (which all Star Trek fans will appreciate).
Jesus’ truth, at that moment, was
fundamentally different to Pilate’s. His
truth included his willing surrender to the hatred of the state, for a much
higher purpose – the salvation of all humanity.
His truth included the certainty, by faith, that his death would not be
the end of his life. So Jesus and
Pilate, experiencing the very same moment in time together, experienced the truth of that moment very differently.
We do well to remember that
Pilate’s maxim, ‘what is Truth?’ applies to all human experiences. Truth, then, it seems really is ‘in the eye
of the beholder’. Each of us experiences
the world differently. But this does not
mean that all truths are either accurate, or that my perception of truth must
trump everyone else’s. Some truths
contain facts which can be verifiably proven.
(I might choose to believe, in my truth, that the Earth is flat. But that does not mean that it really is.)
Returning to the Gospel reading, we
find another example. For both the
Pharisees and the Jesus we encounter through Luke’s eyes, the Devil (or
Beelzebub) was an objective truth. Their
argument centred around the Devil’s involvement or otherwise in the casting out
of demons. The existence of the Devil was not in doubt, within either of their
truths. But for us, as modern day
readers, our truth will probably include a great deal of scepticism about
whether or not the Devil actually exists.
Many of the diseases which Jesus
cured, once attributed to demonic possession, we now know to be caused by
scientifically-understood processes.
And so, we find, that the way we
read the Bible is very different to how, say, the first Christians would have
read it. Our world, and therefore our
truth, is different to theirs. Which
means that we must approach the Bible always in humility, and with wisdom. We must seek to understand the truth
positions of the people in each story, as well as the writer of each
story. And then we must place that story
within our own truth – and learn from it what we may.
If we could truly grasp the
importance of this revelation, the world would be a very different place. Social media, and the newspapers (and this
week, Good Morning Britain) are full of people who want to loudly proclaim that
their truth is the only one that matters.
But actually, if we were ALL more keen to listen to the truth of others,
and less keen on megaphoning our truth, the world would be a much
kinder, more compassionate place. It
would be a place in which we offer forgiveness before judgment, love and
understanding before hatred and recrimination.
It would be a world in which the Kingdom begins to come on earth as it
is in heaven.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment