Texts:
Malachi
3.1–4, 4.5–end
See,
I am sending my messenger to prepare the way before me, and the Lord whom you
seek will suddenly come to his temple. The messenger of the covenant in whom
you delight—indeed, he is coming, says the Lord of hosts. But who can endure
the day of his coming, and who can stand when he appears?
Lo, I will send you the prophet Elijah before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes. He will turn the hearts of parents to their children and the hearts of children to their parents, so that I will not come and strike the land with a curse.
Luke 1.57–66
(This is part of the story of the
nativity of John the Baptiser. In an
earlier section of the story, John’s father, Zechariah, had been visited by an
angel, told that his wife Elizabeth would bear a son, and instructed to call
him John. Zechariah was doubtful, and as
a punishment he was struck dumb. Now we
pick up the story…)
Now the time came for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son. Her neighbours and relatives heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy to her, and they rejoiced with her.
On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to name him Zechariah after his father. But his mother said, ‘No; he is to be called John.’ They said to her, ‘None of your relatives has this name.’ Then they began motioning to his father to find out what name he wanted to give him. He asked for a writing-tablet and wrote, ‘His name is John.’ And all of them were amazed. Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue freed, and he began to speak, praising God. Fear came over all their neighbours, and all these things were talked about throughout the entire hill country of Judea. All who heard them pondered them and said, ‘What then will this child become?’ For, indeed, the hand of the Lord was with him.
Here we are, on the day before Christmas Eve. But the Lectionary stubbornly refuses to let us launch prematurely into the Christmas story. Instead, we are given some more of the background to the story of John the Baptiser. Doubtless, you will recall that we also thought about him last week, on Thursday, too!
Today, the Lectionary presents us with some words of
the prophet Micah, which Christians have always read as predicting the arrival
of John, the messenger who clears the way for the Lord. Micah predicts the coming of the Lord, in
terms which have some resonance with
the story of Jesus as we know it. Micah
refers to the Lord ‘coming to his temple’ – which Jewish readers would
certainly have interpreted as the Lord visibly taking up residence in the Holy
of Holies in Jerusalem. Jesus, in fact,
didn’t arrive like that at all. He didn’t
‘come to his temple’, he came to a stable, and to a manger. Of course, he did subsequently visit the Temple, both as a boy and as a
man – but the Temple held rather less attraction for Jesus than the Hebrew
prophets thought it would. This is, of
course, a salutary warning for anyone who reads Scripture literally. Even when Scripture predicts future events,
it is rarely accurate on the details!
The same is true for predictions about John. Micah clearly calls the messenger of the Lord
‘Elijah’, saying that the prophet Elijah himself will be the one to prepare the
way of the Lord. But, in actual fact, an
Angel tells Zechariah (John’s dad) that the child’s name will be John. Names always have meaning in Scripture. Elijah means ‘My God is Yahweh’. And John’s name translates as ‘God is
gracious’. This is a signal to us that
the coming of the Messiah would be an act of grace on the part of God. Nevertheless, in the New Testament, Jesus
affirms that John is the spiritual successor to Elijah. So, we can, if we wish, combine the meaning
of both Elijah and John together. If we
do, we can suggest a meaning which goes something like ‘My God is Yahweh, who
is gracious’.
This might be a good moment to remind ourselves of
what ‘grace’ is. Grace is when God give
us what we don’t deserve. That, as I’ve
said before, stands in contrast to ‘mercy’, which is when God withholds from us
the punishment which we DO deserve. God’s
act of sending first John, then Jesus, is an act of grace. We human beings, with all our incompetent
failures, don’t deserve that God should care for us. We ignore him, we ignore his wisdom, we
ignore his simple rules for life. We
build our empires, destroy the world he has given, fail to care for each other,
fail to give God the worship he deserves as our creator, our very life. But still God loves us. Still he sends his messenger to us. Still he sends his son. Oh what amazing grace this is!
There’s another aspect of this story that we should
not overlook – namely the way that Zechariah, John’s dad, is struck dumb for
his unbelief in what the Angel tells him is going to happen. It seems a bit severe, doesn’t it? But I think this story is given to us to mark
the contrast between Zechariah’s attitude and that of Mary. When Zechariah is told his news, he replies “How
can I be sure of this? I am an old man and my wife is well along in years.” He basically demands proof – from an Angel,
standing right in front of him!
You can imagine the Angel’s reaction, can’t
you? And Luke does a good job of
revealing the Angel’s reaction: “I am
Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you
and to tell you this good news. And now
you will be silent and not able to speak until the day this happens, because
you did not believe my words, which will come true at their appointed time.” Gabriel is understandably rather peeved, to
say the least!
Then we contrast Zechariah’s reaction with that of
Mary, who says: “I am the Lord’s servant. May your word to me be fulfilled.” Simple, trusting faith. A faith on which the Kingdom of God will be
built. Mary, the simple peasant woman is
contrasted with Zechariah, the ‘know-it-all’ religious leader. Under normal circumstances, you’d expect the
religious leader to be the one who gets what God is up to. But, it is through the simple, humble and
trusting Mary that God’s act of grace will come into the world.
This is, of course, a warning to all of us religious
leaders! I know that I can be guilty of
sometimes thinking that my learning and my religious ordination makes me more
qualified than my congregation to be able to interpret what God is up to! But, God has a way of working around such
arrogance on the part of church leaders.
Over the centuries, he has pulled down many of the edifices of doctrine
and rules which we leaders have a habit of erecting. Slavery was abolished, despite the
protestations of religious leaders who owned slaves. Women were emancipated, over the objection of
religious leaders who sought to keep them in their place. Women entered the priesthood, and then the
House of Bishops, over the protestations of those who were (and some who still
are) quite sure that God will be very very cross if a women should celebrate
the Eucharist. And right now, I think
God is doing something quite profound about the church’s attitude towards
people whose gender identities and sexual preferences are different from what
many religious leaders would consider ‘correct’.
The process begun in the striking dumb of John the
Baptiser’s dad, and the raising up of simple, humble Mary, continues
today. God’s grace is still being poured
out over his church, despite the legalistic barriers which some religious leaders
try to erect. The gentle, loving, yet
persistent force of God’s grace continues to flow. And may it ever do so! Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment